Blog: Pensions and Human Capital

In this teacher pension series, a Maryland teacher writes about her pension experience.
Over the years Missouri legislators have increased pension benefits significantly. But they have not distributed those increases evenly to all teachers.
Tennessee recently released a report that examines teacher retention in relation to effectiveness. Policymakers can use this data to rethink the state’s pension system.
Teacher turnover has risen over the last two decades. What does it mean for teacher pensions?
Are state pension plans a recruitment or retention incentive for teachers? That's complicated, but many of the claims about pensions don't stand up to scrutiny.
A hundred years ago, Illinois teachers received a fixed, annual benefit that was determined independent of salary: a “flat pension.” However, there were severe issues with the original pension system.
A new Manhattan Institute report looks at whether teachers would prefer a traditional or a smooth-accrual defined benefit plan.
Illinois experienced increased teacher retention over the past decade. Rising retention rates however translated to increasing costs, and in 2011, Illinois responded by making it more difficult for a teacher to receive a pension.
The New York Post recently wrote about an 84-year-old man who loves his job at the Port Authority—so much that he works for free.

Thousands of teachers and other public sector workers have been retiring in recent years, fueled in part by changes to their pensions. A January Governing magazine story found increased retirement rates in Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon and Wisconsin. Although this is often portrayed as a bad thing– the pension plan is pushing out scores of experienced workers!—new research from Maria D. Fitzpatrick and Michael F. Lovenheim in Education Next suggests we may not have reason to worry.

Faced with a budget crisis in the early 1990s, Illinois offered teachers a generous early retirement package. Large numbers of older, more experienced teachers took the offer, leading to a threefold increase in retirement rates. Over a two-year period, 10 percent of the total teaching workforce in Illinois retired.

None of the recent stories of mass retirements have been nearly as large as the 10 percent in Illinois, but what happened in Illinois can give us comfort that the retirements of today may not be as bad as predicted.

After the early retirement incentive program, Illinois had a dramatic influx of new teachers and a rapid decline in average teacher experience. The median retiring teacher had 27 years of experience and was replaced by a teacher with less than 3 years of experience. Across the state, average teacher experience declined and the number of new teachers increased substantially. All else equal, and since we know that teacher effectiveness rises with experience, we would have expected student achievement to go down.

But that’s not what happened. Instead, math and English test scores either stayed the same or went up. Importantly, those results held true for low-income, minority, and low-achieving students as well. There may be multiple reasons for this, but the massive retirements didn’t hurt student learning.