January 2014

San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed is sponsoring a statewide ballot initiative that would change California’s constitution to allow state and city governments to make prospective changes to retiree benefits. To better understand the initiative and why he’s sponsoring it, I spoke with Mayor Reed.
Teachers are often lumped in with other public sector workers, but the turnover rates of the teaching profession places them in a much more volatile position than other state or local government positions.
Do pensions affect teacher retention decisions? According to their own data, state pension plans say no, at least for the vast majority of teachers.
Pensions contribute a large amount of money to local economies, but size shouldn't be the end-all argument. We need to get past discussions of size and start talking about the most effective ways to ensure retirement security for all public sector workers.
Every state except Vermont has a balanced budget amendment, yet states have wracked up large unfunded liabilities for their pension and retiree health plans. How can both of these things be true at the same time?
Like city and state governments, the federal government is facing rising pension costs and is dealing with them in similarly unproductive ways.
Cities and states faced with rising pension costs have begun to search for the most effective way to balance retirement promises made to workers with the need for fiscal sustainability and employer flexibility. One such battle is currently playing out in California.
In order to cut costs and recover from the recent recession, New York City recently lengthened the vesting requirement, the time period employees need to stay in order to qualify for even a minimum pension, from five years to ten. Now, half of all new teachers in the Big Apple will not qualify for a retirement benefit.